This isn't a journal post, this is an unedited, rambling rant. I've been reading on this goddamned edition war for over a year now (longer than the new edition's existed), and I dropped out of even trying to discuss it on the Boards well before now, but I'm getting fucking TIRED of reading about it in places where it just doesn't even need to come up.
So, I was reading
iuztheevil 's latest journal post (located here), and of course, the thing began dipping into an edition war fight. It seems to have pulled itself out of the tailspin (many of them have been--a radical improvement), but for a while there, I began to think, "really? Here? REALLY?!"
Look. I've got a confession to make. I'm a 4E fan. I'm a BIG fan. I just like it, sorry to say. Sure, I'll play Pathfinder. I do play Pathfinder, every once in a blue moon, when our group get together, and I have a good time, except for when my sub-optimal character build comes up and bites me in the face. But when you get down to brass tacks, I'd pick the same adventure following 4E rules over the 3.x/Pathfinder one. But that's just it. I like it. You hate it? Cool. You think it took a dump on 30+ years of D&D history, and for some reason can't just use those 30+ of history that you know, chapter and verse, in the new edition anyway? Fine. I mean,
I can. Succubi are devils now, which is, to me, a meaningless classification. Put your Post-It on the page and move on.
My all time favorite right now? Chromatic dragons are Evil. WHAT? They've been Evil as long as I've played (2nd Edition in the early 90's specifically). They were Evil in 3.5, and Eberron didn't care. There's probably more Evil silver dragons in Eberron than Evil chromatic dragons. It's flavor text in a rules dressing. It's meaningless. I could put my character's eye color as "death ray at-will; DC 50 vs. Fortitude," but it doesn't mean shit, honestly.
This is a bit more important to a RPG company, and I understand that. They've got all sorts of alphabet-soup legal acronyms designating what they can and can't change, what they can and can't
use, even. This isn't about that. I'm talking the at-home gamer.
Y'know, I recall hearing at some point in time (during those old
Dungeon and
Dragon magazine days), seeing at least a letter a month from someone bitching because they had devoted X pages to one campaign setting or another. These people were homebrew gamers, and the "implied setting" didn't matter to them. In fact, it angered them that anyone would waste precious pages to anything other than setting-neutral material. These people invented new races, dropped old ones, put in guns, took things back to the Stone Age... I mean, where ARE these people? Teach others your skills!
Another dumb anecdote: when 3E came out, I had never played Greyhawk. So, to me, the gods list was completely useless. It still is. We finished Savage Tide six months ago, which we played in Greyhawk, and as soon as we bid that campaign adieu, that part of Chapter Six went back to being useless. I did not feel the need to rant about the "Gods" of the "implied setting". I just went and
played D&D. It was
fun. Kooky concept, huh? Play game. Have fun.
People seem to want rules for everything. Set rules. In the core rulebooks. EVERYTHING. "How good am I at basketweaving? How good is the village basketweaver at basketweaving? And for that matter, what is her AC, attack roll, and Hit Points at, incase I need to slay her for being better than me at basketweaving?" I. Don't. Care. It will never come up in a way that I can't wing. If you want to have basketweaving in your backstory, perfect! And if it comes up in a way that makes sense, extra-perfect! I'll even try to tie it in. If you choose to slay the basketweaver, I'll ad-hoc some appropriate stats (probably as an AC 10, 1 HP minion with no attacks but a very powerful set of lungs for shouting "HELP!" when sociopathic adventurers roll into town). But do we really need to make it into a rolling situation? It was put into 3E because the design philosophy was "everyone follows the same rules". Not that important to
me, personally. I do not have a compulsive need to find out if the blacksmith can take me with his one level of warrior and five levels of expert.
Sorry. I'm countering screaming with screaming. I just am getting sick of this stuff. I don't even mention it unless someone asks me or something. Everything you need to make your game is already here. I'm playing the same Pathfinder APs with my group that hundreds of others are; mine just has a bunch of different numbers. Cressida Kroft isn't a dragonborn; there are none in our Gloarion (so far). We have a tiefling, but so does the Pathfinder setting. Hell, they come up in the
Guide to Korvosa. and ours look like old-school tieflings. Appearance is flavor. Ben wanted goat legs for his tiefling. I
love goat-legged tieflings. Everyone's happy, and nothing changes rules-wise. No one worships Avandra or Pelor or whoever. They worship the gods of the setting. The Pathfinder flavor has translated well, in my opinion. It feels like Ben's 3.5 Pathfinder game.
Alright. I feel better. Thanks for getting this far.